Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes Following Temporomandibular Joint Discectomy and Fat Graft.

PURPOSE: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discectomy is performed for patients with degenerative joint disease with an unsalvageable disc, but with a salvageable condylar head and glenoid fossa. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence and risk factors associated with poor postoperative outcomes following TMJ discectomy and abdominal fat grafting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent TMJ discectomy. Included in this study were patients who had complete data sets with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Potential risk factors included demographics, preoperative findings (mouth opening, pain levels, previous TMJ surgery), operative findings (disc degeneration, state of TMJ components), and postoperative outcomes (pain levels, mouth opening). Failed outcomes were those who had return of pain postoperatively, no improvement in mouth opening following TMJ discectomy, and/or those who progressed to TMJ total joint replacement (TJR). Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression time to event analyses. RESULTS: This study included 129 patients who had undergone 132 TMJ discectomies. Most patients were female (89.9%), with a mean age of 43.2 years, standard deviation 14.2. The success rate for discectomy was 75.2% and the conversion rate of TMJ discectomy to TJR was 11.7%. A total of 32 patients (24.8%) experienced return of pain. The median time to return of pain or second surgery was 94.4 months (95% CI = 88.3 to 101.8). No risk factors were statistically significant, although mouth opening improvement of less than 10% was associated with higher risk of poor outcome (P = .77). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that lower improvement in mouth opening at 1 year following surgery is likely to result in failure of the TMJ discectomy procedure although the result was not statistically significant. This outcome may ultimately necessitate a TJR.

High-Volume Surgeons Deliver Larger Surgical Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer.

PURPOSE: In oral cavity cancer surgery there are many factors that contribute to the surgical margin; thus, the factors determining patient outcomes are still not completely understood. The aim of this study was to determine which variable or variables had the greatest influence on increasing the size of the surgical margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital of patients who underwent resective surgery for a primary oral cavity cancer from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2012. The primary outcome variable was the surgical margin, defined as the closest distance between the surgical edge and invasive cancer. A heterogeneous set of predictor variables was identified as potentially affecting the primary outcome variable: demographic, 5 surgical, and 7 histologic variables. The data then underwent statistical analysis using univariable linear regression, and variables that were found to have a statistical association were retained in a non-interaction multivariable model. RESULTS: This study included 250 patients. The results showed that high-volume surgeons delivered larger surgical margins than low-volume surgeons. The single most important variable associated with larger surgical margins was who performed the resective operation. The following variables also were associated with smaller surgical margins: retromolar trigone location, non-squamous cell carcinomas, perineural invasion, and a lip-split mandibulectomy surgical approach. CONCLUSION: There was a strong association between high-volume surgeons and larger surgical margins, supporting the rationalization of oral cavity cancer management in high-volume centers and by high-volume surgeons.